PILIHAN ETIKAL DALAM MEMERANGI KEJAHATAN DI INDONESIA

  • Balthasar Watunglawar Politeknik Saint Paul Sorong
Keywords: evil, good, embattle, triviality, ethical destruction, readjustment

Abstract

This study aims to find and explain efforts to embattle crime. The research was conducted with qualitative methods. Data obtained through interview and documentation techniques were collected for further condensation and conclusion. The results of the study inform that efforts to embattle crime are carried out in two ways, namely the way of evil and the way of goodness. The way of evil is the punishment that equals or burdens the perpetrators of crimes so that they are not sufficient in moral value, such as the death penalty for narcotics crimes, murder, and corruption. The second is the path of goodness. Evil must always be rewarded with good, as the moral imperative of Thomas Aquinas, "Bonum est faciendum et prosequendum, et malum vitandum". Some of the tools that are considered well in embattle crime, such as: sea execution, triviality, ethical destruction, and readjustment

References

[1] Watunglawar, B., Leba, K., & Watunglawar, M. N. (2021). Eksekusi Laut: Berfilsafat Tentang Hukuman Legal di Indonesia, Alternatif Solutif Penghapusan Hukuman Mati dan Minimalisasi Kejahatan. Yogyakarta: Griya Pustaka Utama.
[2] Alam, A. (2010). Pengantar Kriminologi. Makasar: Pustaka Refleksi.
[3] Rukmini, M. (2006). Aspek Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi. Bandung: PT Alumni.
[4] Siswanto, J. (2000). Kejahatan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Proses Whitehead. Jurnal Filsafat, Seri ke-31, 167-178
[5] Gultom, A. F. (2016). Enigma Kejahatandalam Sekam Filsafat Ketuhanan. Intizar, 23-34.
[6] Liputan 6. (2020, Juli 1). Retrieved Nopember 4, 2020. From Liputan 6 Website https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/4293122/bnpb-1549-bencana-alam-terjadi-di-indonesia-hingga-juni-2020
[7] Suseno, F. M. (1987). Etika Dasar Masalah-Masalah Pokok Filsafat Moral. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
[8] Bernard, L. T. (2011). Penegakan Hukum dalam Terang Etika. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
[9] Sugiono. (2005). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitati dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA.
[10] Wignjosoebroto, S. (2002). Hukum (Paradigma, Metode, dan Masalahnya). Jakarta: ELSAM & HUMA.
[11] Hermawan, C. (2003). Hukum Sebagai Panglima. Jakarta: Kompas.
[12] Watunglawar, B., & Leba, K. (2020). Kesejahteraan Sosial: Sebuah Perspektif Dialektis. JPPKN, 10-24.
[13] Watunglawar, B., Leba, K., & Watunglawar, M. N. (2021). Eksekusi Laut: Berfilsafat Tentang Hukuman Legal di Indonesia, Alternatif Solutif Penghapusan Hukuman Mati dan Minimalisasi Kejahatan. Yogyakarta: Griya Pustaka Utama.
[14] Giuseppe, B. (2007). The Moral Status of the First Principle of Practical Reason in Thomas’s Natural-Law Theory . The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, The Catholic University of America Press, Vol.71, 609-631
[15] Siswanto, J. (2000). Kejahatan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Proses Whitehead. Jurnal Filsafat, 167-178.
Published
2021-07-22
How to Cite
Watunglawar, B. (2021). PILIHAN ETIKAL DALAM MEMERANGI KEJAHATAN DI INDONESIA. SOSCIED, 4(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.32531/jsoscied.v4i1.371